Peshawar Tartan Running Track Under Scrutiny: Who Is Responsible?
Musarrat Ullah Jan , KikxNow , Digital Creator
PKR 680 Million Revised Cost, Track Damage at Two Locations,
Unanswered RTI Request, and Serious Questions for the Sports Directorate
The Peshawar tartan running track project, being implemented under the
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Sports Directorate, raises serious questions about
construction quality, financial transparency, project supervision, and official
accountability.
An RTI application submitted on 6 August 2025 sought
records relating to the original and revised PC-1, the reported revised project
cost of PKR 680 million, contractor payments, the contract agreement,
construction delays, audit reports, and any departmental inquiries. According
to the applicant, the requested information has still not been provided.
There are also claims that the track has come apart at two locations. These
claims require an independent technical inspection and documentary
verification. If the damage is confirmed, the public deserves to know whether
it resulted from defective materials, poor installation, inadequate
supervision, maintenance issues, or another cause.
The role of the Sports Directorate’s Engineering Wing must be examined. Who
supervised the construction? Who certified the quality of the work? Who
verified the measurements and approved the contractor’s bills? Were defects
recorded during inspections, and if so, what action followed?
Accountability must be established through the official record, not
assumptions.
·
Sports Directorate: Must
explain the project’s current status, expenditure, delays, and response to the
RTI application.
·
Engineering Wing: Must disclose
inspection records, quality-control reports, measurements, and completion or
payment certifications.
·
Project management and supervising
officers: Must explain how construction quality was monitored and
whether defects were identified.
·
Contractor: Must answer
questions about compliance with contractual specifications and responsibility
for any verified construction defects.
·
Inspection team and competent
authorities: Must clarify the findings of inspections and whether
corrective action was ordered.
1. Why
has the RTI application dated 6 August 2025 reportedly remained unanswered?
2. What
documents justify the reported revised cost of PKR 680 million?
3. How
much has been paid to the contractor, and against which verified milestones?
4. Has
the damaged track been technically examined?
5. Who
approved the relevant construction work and certified its quality?
6. What
did the Governor’s inspection team record in its inspection report?
7. Were
any notices, penalties, inquiries, or recovery proceedings initiated?
The government should not rely on the mere existence of an Engineering Wing
or an inspection visit as a substitute for accountability. An inspection
without a published report, identified responsibility, and documented follow-up
leaves the central questions unanswered.
The Sports Directorate should release the relevant project documents,
arrange an independent technical assessment, and clarify the responsibility of
each official and contractor involved. Any allegations of negligence or
irregularity must be established through evidence and due process.
Public money requires public accountability. The people deserve
documents, findings, and answers, not silence.
#KhyberPakhtunkhwa #SportsDirectorate #Peshawar #TartanTrack #RTI
#PublicAccountability #Transparency #EngineeringWing #GovernorInspectionTeam
#SportsInfrastructure #KikxNow
Comments
Post a Comment