KPCTA Records Show 10-Bike Discrepancy in Tourism Police Fleet, Raising Questions Over Transparency and Asset Management
Musarrat Ullah Jan , KikxNow Digital Creator
PESHAWAR: Contradictory
official records issued by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Culture and Tourism Authority
(KPCTA) have raised serious questions about transparency, asset management, and
accountability regarding the motorbike fleet allocated to the province's
Tourism Police.
An official response
issued by the KPCTA Public Information Officer (PIO) on April 25, 2025,
under the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information (RTI) Act stated that 25
Honda 150cc motorcycles had been procured for the Tourism Police
across the province.
However, a recently
released official fuel allocation record presents a different
picture, showing a total fleet of 35 motorcycles, including 34
operational units and one motorcycle reported out of service following an
accident. The discrepancy leaves 10 motorcycles unaccounted for between
two official records issued by the same authority.
The inconsistencies are
not limited to the total fleet size. The district-wise allocation of
motorcycles has also changed significantly.
According to the April
2025 RTI response, the KPCTA Head Office in Peshawar had six
motorcycles assigned to it. In the latest fuel allocation record,
only two operational motorcycles are listed for the head
office.
Similarly, the number
of motorcycles allocated to Abbottabad increased from five
to seven, with one additional motorcycle marked as damaged following an
accident. Mansehra's allocation increased from four to
six, Swat's from four to seven, Upper
Dir's from two to four, and Chitral's from four
to seven.
Another notable
inconsistency is the appearance of Shangla, which did not appear in
the April 2025 allocation list but is included in the latest record with one
allocated motorcycle.
The conflicting
documents raise several important administrative questions. If an additional 10
motorcycles were procured after April 2025, where are the procurement records,
approvals, tender documents, purchase orders, and official notifications? If no
additional procurement took place, why do two official documents issued by the
same authority present different fleet figures?
The discrepancies also
cast doubt on the accuracy of fuel consumption records, maintenance
expenditures, inventory management, and asset tracking. If the exact number of
motorcycles cannot be consistently established, questions naturally arise
regarding the monitoring of public assets and the auditing of fuel
expenditures.
Transparency advocates
argue that the KPCTA should immediately clarify whether a second procurement
was carried out after April 2025 or whether the inconsistencies are the result
of administrative mismanagement, poor record-keeping, or weaknesses in internal
controls.
As a public authority
responsible for managing taxpayer-funded resources, KPCTA is expected to
maintain accurate and consistent records. The existence of contradictory
official documents concerning government-owned assets undermines public
confidence and highlights the need for greater transparency, stronger internal
oversight, and an independent review of the Tourism Police fleet records.
Until a formal
explanation is provided, the discrepancy over the missing 10 motorcycles is
likely to fuel further questions about inventory control, public asset
management, and accountability within the authority.
#KPCTA
#TourismPolice #RightToInformation #RTI #Transparency #PublicAccountability
#GoodGovernance #KhyberPakhtunkhwa #PublicFunds #Audit #InvestigativeJournalism
#GovernmentRecords #AssetManagement #Pakistan #Accountability
Comments
Post a Comment