Charsadda Sports RTI Response Arrives After 20 Months, Rs6.66 Million Spent but No Head-Wise Breakdown
Musarrat Ullah Jan , KikxNow Digital Creator
PESHAWAR: The District Sports Office Charsadda has provided a
response to a Right to Information (RTI) request concerning sports activities,
funds, expenditures and registered sports clubs after a delay of
approximately 20 months and 27 days. However, the
official response does not provide a head-wise or event-wise
breakdown of Rs6,665,799 reportedly spent on sports activities.
According
to the document, the RTI application was filed on November 12,
2024, while the response was provided after the financial year 2026-27
had already begun. This means the applicant waited almost 21 months
for information concerning expenditure during the financial year 2024-25.
According
to the District Sports Office Charsadda, a total of 21 sports
events and tournaments were organised in the district during
financial year 2024-25.
The
events included cricket, hockey, football, swimming, badminton, cycling,
kabaddi, archery, karate and table tennis, along with various coaching and
training camps.
The
official response states that a total of 2,747 teams participated
in these activities.
The
document further states that Rs6,665,799 was allocated for
sports activities during financial year 2024-25, while the same amount, Rs6,665,799,
was reported as expenditure.
The
District Sports Office has also reported that 163 sports clubs are
active and registered in Charsadda.
The
district generated Rs408,150 in revenue from sports activities during
the same financial year, according to the official response.
Regarding
coaches, the department reported that eight sanctioned BPS-16
coaching posts are vacant in Charsadda.
However,
despite the lengthy delay in providing the information, the response does not
explain how the Rs6.66 million was spent.
It
does not specify how much was spent on individual sports such as cricket,
hockey, football or swimming, how much was spent on tournaments, coaching and
training camps, or how much was spent on sports equipment, food, transportation
and other expenditure heads.
The
response also does not provide a detailed picture of the 163
registered sports clubs.
It
remains unclear from the information provided which sports these clubs
represent, how many of them are actually active, how many participated in
government-organised events, and what facilities or support they received from
the District Sports Office after registration.
This
raises another important question: if 163 sports clubs are officially
registered and active in the district, were they provided financial
assistance, sports equipment, coaching, training opportunities or other
government facilities from the public sports budget?
Similarly,
although the department has reported 21 sports events and various coaching and
training camps, the response does not provide event-wise
expenditure, camp-wise expenditure, participation records or details of which
registered clubs benefited from these activities.
Another
question concerns the delay itself.
Why
was an RTI request seeking information about financial year 2024-25 expenditure
answered only after financial year 2026-27 had begun?
According
to the official document, the response was submitted in the context of
proceedings before the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Commission and
was also provided to the applicant.
Reporting
a total expenditure of Rs6,665,799 establishes how much money was reportedly
spent, but it does not establish where the money was spent, which
events received funding, under which expenditure heads the money was used, or
who ultimately benefited from it.
The
official response itself refers to 163 registered clubs, 21 sports events,
2,747 participating teams and various training and coaching camps.
The
logical next question is therefore straightforward:
Where is the complete head-wise and event-wise expenditure
record for the Rs6,665,799?
For
public accountability, the total amount alone is not enough. A meaningful
assessment of public spending requires the underlying expenditure
records, beneficiaries, bills, vouchers, event-wise statements and supporting documents.
Until
those records are disclosed, the official figures provide only a partial
picture of how public funds were used for sports in Charsadda.
#RTI
#KhyberPakhtunkhwa #SportsDirectorate #Charsadda #Sports #Transparency
#Accountability #PublicFunds #RightToInformation #KPIC #SportsInKP
#InvestigativeJournalism #Pakistan #SportsJournalism
Comments
Post a Comment