KP Sports Directorate: RTI Request Still Pending as Top-Level Silence Raises Serious Questions
Musarrat Ullah Jan , KikxNow , Digital Creator
Peshawar: A Right to Information (RTI) request concerning
Lala Ayub Hockey Stadium in the provincial capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
remains unresolved for an extended period, raising concerns not only about
administrative delays but also about the apparent absence of senior-level
oversight.
According to details, a citizen filed an application under
the KP Right to Information Act 2017 seeking comprehensive records related to
the stadium’s infrastructure, machinery maintenance, financial expenditures,
and administrative decisions. Despite the passage of considerable time, the
requested information has not been fully provided.
The initial response directed the applicant to the Pakistan
Sports Board. However, the Sports Board clarified that the matter falls under
the jurisdiction of the provincial Sports Directorate. As a result,
responsibility has shifted between institutions without any substantive
disclosure of records.
Key Issues Still Unanswered
The RTI application includes several critical points that
remain unresolved:
Complete breakdown of expenses on hockey turf machinery
maintenance, including bills and work orders
Details of companies or individuals involved in repair work
Allegations regarding the use of bottled water to operate
machines, and whether any inquiry was initiated
Copy of any dissent note reportedly issued by the former
Director General and the decision taken on it
Legal documentation regarding the transfer of stadium
control to the provincial Sports Directorate and its approval authority
Record of old fences and fountains removed from the stadium,
including their current whereabouts and distribution
DG-Level Silence Raises Accountability Concerns
Sources indicate that the current Director General has not
formally engaged the Public Information Officer (PIO) regarding the pending RTI
request. This lack of follow-up raises concerns about internal monitoring and
administrative accountability within the department.
Under RTI law, responsibility does not rest solely with the
PIO. The head of the department is also expected to ensure timely compliance,
particularly in matters involving public funds and state assets.
The matter has also been escalated to the RTI Commission,
where a formal complaint has been registered. However, proceedings remain
delayed, further extending the timeline of non-disclosure.
When a citizen in the provincial capital is forced to wait months
for basic public records, while institutions shift responsibility between each
other and senior oversight remains absent, the effectiveness of the Right to
Information regime itself comes into question.
This case goes beyond procedural delay. It highlights deeper
concerns about transparency, institutional accountability, and the practical
enforcement of access to information laws in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
#RTIFailure #RightToInformation #KPTransparency #SportsGovernance #PublicAccountability #LalaAyubStadium #AdministrativeNegligence #TransparencyMatters
Comments
Post a Comment