One Year of Silence on Strategy-II: Where Is the Policy, and Where Is the Implementation?

 

Musarrat uLLAH jan , KikxNow Digital Creator

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Sports Policy 2018 made a bold promise. Sports would not remain a routine departmental activity. It would be transformed into an economic sector. Private investment would be encouraged. Retired athletes would find employment. Sports centers would be organized under clear standards. Collaboration with the Chamber of Commerce would support investment growth. This vision was formally framed as Strategy-II.

The question is simple: has this vision materialized, or does it exist only on paper?

A formal information request related to the implementation of Strategy-II has remained pending for almost one year. It is not a political statement. It contains no slogans. It focuses strictly on policy execution. The request seeks details of practical steps taken under Strategy-II, the number of private sports centers registered, employment provided to retired athletes, the existence of a legal framework, and copies of relevant agreements or documents.

If these measures have been implemented, why have the supporting documents not been provided? If they have not been implemented, then why is there a gap between policy language and ground reality?

The policy states that the private sector will invest in sports infrastructure. However, investment does not occur through statements alone. It requires a structured system, clear incentives, defined registration procedures, and active monitoring. Without these elements, private participation cannot function effectively.

Has the department developed a formal model for this purpose? Were any individuals or organizations officially selected? Were agreements signed? If so, where are the records? If not, why has no clarification been issued?

Without transparency and structured regulation, private investment remains a theoretical concept rather than an operational reality.

In the sports ecosystem, retired athletes often represent one of the most vulnerable groups. If the policy speaks of industrialization, it must include employment pathways for former players. The key question is how many retired athletes have been employed in private sports centers under this strategy. Is there any documented data?

If the department does not maintain records, how is policy oversight being conducted? Claims without statistics cannot be independently verified. Accountability requires measurable indicators.

If private sports centers are being established, classification standards should exist. Without grading systems such as A, B, or C, how is quality determined? Have registration criteria been formally introduced? Have safety regulations been issued? Are inspection reports produced on a regular basis?

Work conducted in the name of industrial development is credible only when supported by a strong regulatory framework. Otherwise, it risks becoming an unregulated activity without oversight.

 

For sports to evolve into an industry, collaboration with the business community is essential. Has there been formal engagement with the Chamber of Commerce? Were joint forums organized? Were investors officially invited? If cooperation exists, where is the documentary evidence?

The central question remains: has a sports industry actually been established?

An industry is not defined by terminology. It is defined by measurable indicators: private capital flow, manufacturing activity, export data, employment statistics, and structured reporting mechanisms.

If these elements exist, they should be publicly documented. If they do not exist, then it must be acknowledged that Strategy-II has not yet transitioned into full operational implementation.

One year of silence strengthens concerns that records may not be properly maintained, implementation may be limited, or transparency mechanisms may be weak. The success of any policy is determined by documented evidence. If files exist, they should be released under the right to information framework. If they do not exist, then the questions of planning and accountability remain unanswered.

The 2018 Sports Policy created expectations that sports would become an economic sector. However, expectations turn into reality only when supported by systems, monitoring, and transparency.

A one-year delay is not merely an administrative issue. It is a test of institutional seriousness in policy execution. If Strategy-II is functioning, the records should reflect it. If it is not functioning, a clear explanation is necessary.

The claim of transforming sports into an industry will only be credible when verifiable evidence is made available. Without documentation, policy remains a statement rather than a system.

#RTI #SportsPolicy2018 #KPKSports #Transparency #RightToInformation #Accountability #SportsGovernance #PrivateSector #SportsIndustry #InvestigativeJournalism